******
President Obama will lean forward to play hard with a very weak hand.Obama will escalate US intervention in the area, in both Afghanistan and Pakistan.
While the nominal sovereignty of each nation would be maintained, we will see renewed U.S. efforts to turn them in one degree or another into "client states."
That is the conclusion to be drawn from an October 26 speech before Council of Foreign Relations by John Kerry, D Mass., Chair of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.
While Sen. Kerry does not officially speak for President Obama, he is intimately involved with the evolution of Afghanistan policy.
Below, from his speech, is the bottom line:
******
******
There will be a hybrid policy of clear and hold in some areas -- but a looser presence of military strikes elsewhere.
The goal of clearing and holding all of Afghanistan is rejected.
The Administration will trim down the call of General Stanley McChrystal for up to 40,000 additional troops for Afghanistan.
For Administration plans to focus on limited parts of the country, see The New York Times, October 27:
"At the moment, the administration is looking at protecting Kabul, Kandahar, Mazar-i-Sharif, Kunduz, Herat, Jalalabad and a few other village clusters, officials said. The first of any new troops sent to Afghanistan would be assigned to Kandahar, the Taliban’s spiritual capital, seen as a center of gravity in pushing back insurgent advances.
"But military planners are also pressing for enough troops to safeguard major agricultural areas, like the hotly contested Helmand River valley, as well as regional highways essential to the economy — tasks that would require significantly more reinforcements beyond the 21,000 deployed by Mr. Obama this year..."Military officers said that they would maintain pressure on insurgents in remote regions by using surveillance drones and reports from people in the field to find pockets of Taliban fighters and to guide attacks, in particular by Special Operations forces."
******
Major pressure on Afghan government will combine with continuing full court press on Pakistan to step up its offensive against Taliban in Waziristan.
Although Washington denies it, American aid to Pakistan will be directly or indirectly conditioned on its willingness to co-operate with the U.S. -- and break with fundamentalists in its social programs.
******
In short the move is for more aggressive involvement in the affairs of both countries. The aim is to stabilize both around a pro American orientation -- and squeeze the Taliban by military pressure from both Afghanistan and Pakistan.
It is clear there is already a growing anti-American backlash in both Afghanistan and Pakistan -- where the appearance of being American puppets is hardly desired.
******
See this writer's analysis of the range of options open to Obama -- and the pitfalls of all of them.
******
******