Thursday, February 23, 2006

Bush helps boost the power of fundamentalist Iran

President George W. Bush has opened the door for Iran to make a fresh grab for power in the Middle East.

That is one result of the Bush decision to overthrow Saddam Hussein and destroy his long-term hope to dominate the region.

The American led invasion has eliminated Saddam's "buffer" against neighboring Iran and opened a vacuum for growing Iranian power. An Iran pledged to eliminate Israel and seemingly on a path toward nuclear weapons.

The very same Iran which had tossed out the American-backed Shah, held US hostages in late 1979, and humbled the greatest power on earth.

Now that Iraq splinters into religious conflict and terrorism, the American occupation has taken over the task of holding together a "buffer" against Iran.

Of course the Bush Administration hopes to isolate, undermine, and overthrow Iranian fundamentalists with possible sanctions against development of Iranian nuclear power.

Only time will tell how much of a long term boost the Bush policy gives to the very same revived Shite militant fundamentalist Iran which President Reagan had built up Saddam to oppose -- way back during the Iran Iraq war of the 1980's. (See photo above)

Ironically some who pushed for the invasion of Iraq hoped the overthrow of Saddam would open the door for revived American power in the Middle East -- some 20 years after the Iranians threw the Americans out.

For background perspective on the drive for an American "comeback," see this writer's Human Rights Justifies a March Toward War.

It is anyone's guess what will happen if and when the Americans leave Iraq. Some like Barbara K. Bodine, coordinator for post-conflict reconstruction for Baghdad and the central region of Iraq in 2003, have argued American withdrawal might actually promote internal reconciliation in Iraq.

This writer explores the growing American bipartisan consensus for withdrawal in the blog Exploding the Iraq Illusion. For exhaustive collections of online texts, see Iraq Withdrawal and Exit Plans and Insurgent Iraq, both by the Project on Defense Alternatives.

For more immediate material on the rise of Iran, see the analysis in the Los Angeles Times, excerpts below:

******
2/18/06 Los Angeles Times
NEWS ANALYSIS
Iran Was on Edge; Now It's on Top
The war in Iraq has bolstered the regime's influence in the region and made it bolder.

By Megan K. Stack and Borzou Daragahi, Times Staff Writers

BAGHDAD — The Islamic government in neighboring Iran watched with trepidation in March 2003 when U.S.-led troops stormed Iraq to overthrow Saddam Hussein's regime and start remaking the political map of the Mideast.

In retrospect, the Islamic Republic could have celebrated: The war has left America's longtime nemesis with profound influence in the new Iraq and pushed it to the apex of power in the region.

Emboldened by its new status and shielded by deep oil reserves, Tehran is pressing ahead with its nuclear program, daring the international community to impose sanctions. Iran is a Shiite Muslim nation with an ethnic Persian majority, and the blossoming of its influence has fueled the ambitions of long-repressed Shiites throughout the Arab world.

At the same time, Tehran has tightened alliances with groups such as Hamas, which recently won Palestinian elections, and with governments in Damascus and Beijing.

In the 1980s, Iran spent eight years and thousands of lives waging a war to overthrow Hussein, whose regime buffered the Sunni Muslim-dominated Arab world from Iran. But in the end, it took the U.S.-led invasion to topple Iraq's dictator and allow Iranian influence to spread through a chaotic, battle-torn country.

Now Iraq's fledgling democracy has placed power in the hands of the nation's Shiite majority and its Kurdish allies, many of whom lived as exiles in Iran and maintain strong religious, cultural and linguistic ties to it.

2 comments:

MataHarley said...

Hello Fredric

I wished to pay a reciprocal visit to your blogworld after your foray into mine (and Alia's...). I am sufficiently intrigued.

The PDA link is most interesting, as well as other articles on their site.

And I do love your "our excesses can be our worst enemy" quote. Indeed, and unarguably true. I do not think you took the cowardly way out of the 'toon hysteria. You did not withhold or censor information, yet you thought it wiser not to personally post offensive, racial material that could be easily viewed elsewhere. You covered a reader's ability to know without compromising your own judgement that it was tasteless to run in the first place. I would have done the same.

I'm fascinated with your suggestion that the conversion of Iraq to a fledgling, self-governed nation diminishes the geographic boundary between Iran and those they'd love to consume. I'm of the opposite notion - that it actually made Iran more of an island - putting a free nation between it and it's counterparts in Syria.

Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Afghanistan have already committed themselves to pursuing western economics (at their own paces, of course). Overall, it seems to me that there are more ME countries that want a stable and prosperous economic base as the preference over the 3rd world status that despotic, fundamentalist rule brings. We're actively nurturing younger generations to want "stuff"... LOL.

But, as you say, only time will tell.

You've definitely been bookmarked for me as a cogent, alternative voice and slant on things. You've certainly had more first hand experience in the hot areas of our time.

Then again, they've always been the "hot areas" thru out history, yes?

Frederic A. Moritz said...

Metaharley, we are on a similar wave length -- though perhaps different conclusions.

I do believe the verdict is still out on Iraq --- and I would guess it may well evolve into something neither you nor I can quite predict --- for in fact both things may be happening -- both what you suggest and what I suggest........

So many influences -- and so many imponderables with outcomings depending upon many sorts of brews.

History resists easy prediction -- except when one gazes backward. Let us hope that the American presence in Iraq evolves in an overall constructive direction -- but in such a complex world it may be a mistake to expect either hell or heaven on earth!!!! The Middle East shows few signs of quickly becoming a "cold spot."

Winners and losers there will always be.....

Fred